Fidel Castro: History Will Absolve Me - Analysis | Milestone Documents - Milestone Documents

Fidel Castro: History Will Absolve Me

( 1953 )

Explanation and Analysis of the Document

On October 16, 1953, Fidel Castro made his more than two-hour-long History Will Absolve Me speech in his own defense in court in Cuba. Castro begins with an outline of the events leading up to the attack on the Moncada Barracks. He denounces the authorities for attempting to pretend that he was too sick to appear in court. In his speech, Castro analyzes the factors that led to the failure of the Moncada Barracks attack. Although he accepts full responsibility for his acts and admits that the attack was a military failure, he proclaims the attack to be a political victory for the Cuban people. He announces that there is a new popular armed struggle for Cuban independence against Fulgencio Batista's dictatorship. Castro maintains an anti-imperialist tone throughout his argument and outlines how he plans to transform Cuban society.

Cuba's Economic and Social State

In his speech Castro describes the difficult social and economic climate created by the Batista regime in Cuba. Unemployment was the most pressing social problem in Cuba at this time. In 1953 the number of out-of-work Cubans reached six hundred thousand, and only 51.5 percent of the working-age population was employed. The government under Batista embezzled the retirement funds of the elderly and used the money for the regime's own gain. In addition, many Cuban farmers did not own the land that they worked and therefore were also impoverished. Speaking of these farmers, Castro refers to the tyranny of the Rural Guard, which the Cuban government had established in 1902 to protect the countryside; the Rural Guard soon became an arm of the large plantations primarily owned by U.S. citizens, and it repressed the rural population in an effort to keep Cuban citizens from owning their own land. Along with land distribution issues, the quality and accessibility of education were major concerns of the day. Hundreds of thousands of Cuban citizens in 1953 were illiterate, and six hundred thousand children did not attend school. There were ten thousand out-of-work teachers, and many recent Cuban college graduates were forced to take jobs that had nothing to do with their degrees.

The Five Revolutionary Laws

The five revolutionary laws sought to solve Cuba's economic and social crisis. Castro wrote them before the Moncada Barracks attack. Had the attack been successful and had Castro's forces taken over the radio station, the laws would have been broadcast for the Cuban public to hear. Castro suggests that Colonel Alberto R. del Río Chaviano, the officer who arrested him and his companions, destroyed the papers that had the five revolutionary laws written on them. Some of these laws were put into effect when the revolutionary government gained power in 1959.

The first revolutionary law proposed to return power to the people and to reinstitute the 1940 Cuban Constitution that Batista had revoked in 1952. Castro claims that the revolutionary movement is the only source of legitimate power and that it would take over the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of the Cuban government. For Castro, a reformation of the judicial branches was imperative, because most of the judges and magistrates had pledged their allegiance to Batista after the coup. The second revolutionary law calls for the redistribution of land to small farmers in order to solve the problem of rural poverty. Castro describes redistributing the land according to caballerías, a measurement of land that is often used in Cuba and which is equivalent to 13.43 hectares.

The third revolutionary law would grant laborers the right to a share in the profits of the industrial, mercantile, and mining companies. Castro exempts agriculture because it is covered by the agrarian reform law. The fourth revolutionary law grants all sugar planters the right to share 55 percent of the sugar production in Cuba and establishes a minimum allocation of profits for each sugarcane crop farmer. Castro describes the allotted sugar production in arrobas, a weight measurement used for cane sugar in Cuba. One arroba is equivalent to twenty-five pounds, and forty thousand arrobas is equivalent to 460 metric tons. Finally, the fifth revolutionary law lays out Castro's plan and terms for recuperating funds that were misappropriated under the Batista government. He proposes to apply these reclaimed finances to workers' retirement and the construction and betterment of social service institutions such as hospitals.

Castro also takes the opportunity to outline aspects of Cuba's foreign policy under a revolutionary government. He would unify Cuba with the rest of the Americas just as the Cuban independence leader José Martí had hoped to do after gaining Cuban independence from Spain in 1898. Castro claims that this policy, along with the aforementioned laws, would have been put immediately into place had his forces been successful. Castro also emphasizes that the five revolutionary laws are based on the articles of the 1940 Cuban Constitution. For example, Article 90 outlaws large estates, and Article 60 requires that the government provide employment for its citizens.

Castro's economic goals were to convert Cuba from a supplier of raw materials—such as sugarcane and tobacco—to a producer of industrial goods and to return Cuba's land to Cuban ownership. He explains that because of this unequal land distribution, the breadwinner in the Cuban family could work only four months a year during the sugarcane harvest season. Multinational corporations such as the United Fruit Company and the West Indian Company owned 25 percent of all Cuban land, much of which they had appropriated through fraud and force.

Castro peppers his speech with literary and biblical references. He alludes to a character in the nineteenth-century French writer Honoré de Balzac's short story “The Fatal Skin” to emphasize the assumption of Batista and his followers that wealth and power places them above constitutional law. Castro quotes the character Taillefer, who says, “Let us drink to the power of gold! Mr. Valentine, a millionaire six times over, has just ascended the throne. He is king, … is above everyone, as all the rich are.” And he goes on to say, “The country cannot continue begging on its knees for miracles from a few golden calves, like the Biblical one destroyed by the prophet’s fury.” Castro also condemns Carlos Saladrigas, a conservative politician and adviser to Batista. Castro claims that Saladrigas's capitalist economic model is nonfunctioning and asserts that none of Cuba's ruling elite who live on Fifth Avenue, the wealthiest street in Havana, have remedied any of Cuba's social and economic problems.

The Moncada Program: Fixing Cuba's Six Socioeconomic Problems

The next part of Castro's argument outlines the principal methods of the Moncada program. Castro offers solutions for the six socioeconomic problems that he identifies as the most pressing: land distribution, the need for industrialization, the housing problem, unemployment, access to education, and health care reform. Castro states that the solution to the problem of land redistribution begins with economists' and other experts' reevaluation of Cuba's industrial complex and the prompt removal of corrupt officials from office. He wants to provide housing for both rural and urban Cuban citizens and to implement infrastructure development throughout the island. He also plans to redistribute land to one hundred thousand small tenant farmers. His plan includes draining the swamps, replanting the forest, creating agricultural cooperatives, lowering rent prices, constructing new apartment buildings, and using atomic power to bring electricity to the most remote parts of the island. All of this, he asserts, would be accomplished if Cuba would stop investing in the military to defend the island, which Castro is quick to point out does not have any land borders. Castro again refers to the Cuban independence hero Martí, whom he calls the “apostle,” in order to bolster support for an education reform plan that encompasses urban and rural education.

Justification of the Moncada Barracks Defeat

Next, Castro justifies the rebels' loss at the Moncada Barracks. He uses their defeat to disprove the accusation that Carlos Prío Socarrás, president of the Republic of Cuba from 1948 until Batista seized power in 1952, supplied Castro and his movement with a million pesos. Castro wanted to be sure to publicly denounce any affiliation that his movement was rumored to have with Prío, whose government was characterized as overly interested in North American economic and political interests as well as being corrupt and anti-Communist. Castro refutes accusations of an affiliation on the ground that, had his forces been given that much money, they would have had enough supplies and combatants to prevail at Moncada. Castro also brings up the testimony of the ballistic technicians, lieutenants Eusebio Berrio and Heriberto Amador Cruz. Contrary to what Batista had claimed, on October 5, 1953, the lieutenants testified that the weapons used at the Moncada Barracks attacks were not bought by the rebels from foreign countries.

Castro then refers to the Batista regime's crime against those of Castro's fellow combatants who were captured at the Moncada Barracks. He once again quotes Martí in order to associate his revolutionary cause with the hero of Cuba's independence movement. Martí's poem “To My Dead Brothers on November 27th” pays homage to eight Cuban medical students whom the Spanish courts accused of desecrating the tomb of the Spanish journalist Gonzalo de Castañón (d. 1871). They were found guilty after a hurried trial and executed by firing squad on November 27, 1871. This event took place during the Ten Years' War (1868–1878), the first of Cuba's three wars of independence against Spain. Castro declares that the crimes of 1871 (the shooting of the eight medical students) are multiplied by ten on July 26–29, 1953, thus denouncing the murder of his men by Batista's troops.

Castro goes on to counter Batista's assertion that his coup on March 10, 1952, had the aim of stopping a planned coup by President Prío. Batista maintained that Prío was planning his own coup in April 1952 in order to thwart a win by the Orthodox Party in the general elections scheduled to take place in June of that year. There is no historical evidence to back up Batista's declaration. Castro goes on to counter the false accusations that Batista made against Castro's troops who participated in the Moncada Barracks attacks. Batista claimed that Castro's men had killed sick patients in the hospital that they took over. Colonel Alberto del Río Chaviano also stated that Castro's people had stabbed three patients in the hospital. However, Edmundo Tamayo Silveiro, the director of the Joaquín Castillo Duany Military Hospital, swore in court that no military personnel were killed by knives or any other sharp weapons during the assault. Castro tries to demonstrate that the soldiers serving under Batista sympathize with the revolutionary cause. He states that the soldiers are also indignant and shamed by the murder of Castro's comrades. Castro ends his speech with the now famous line that is the title of this text, “I do not fear prison, as I do not fear the fury of the miserable tyrant who took the lives of 70 of my comrades. Condemn me. It does not matter. History will absolve me.”

Image for: Fidel Castro: History Will Absolve Me

Fidel Castro (Library of Congress)

View Full Size